Strategy backtester

Test any of 20 strategies on any ticker — long, short, or both — against free historical prices, and compare to buy & hold. Set trading cost and a stop-loss for a realistic run. Historical simulation only (dividends not modeled); past performance is not indicative of future results, and this is analysis, not advice.

Fast MASlow MAFastSlowSignalRSI lenBuy<Sell>PeriodStd×Lookbackno parametersMorning momentum: breakout → pullback holds → confirmation. Fixed rules, no parameters; real 0DTE option prices. Ignores the cost/stop/range fields below. Best on SPY/QQQ/IWM.
Direction lets you trade short too. Cost = bps per trade; stop-loss exits after that % adverse move (0 = off). "Compare all" runs every strategy.
-8.3%
Total Return
$9,174
Ending Value
-32.6%
CAGR
-31.3%
Max Drawdown
-0.02
Sharpe
100%
Win Rate
1
Trades
11%
Time in Market
FRVO · SMA Crossover Long & Short turned $10,000 into $9,174 (-8.3%) vs buy & hold $6,169 (-38.3%) over 2026-05-13→2026-07-31 — it beat buy & hold by 30.1%, worst drawdown 31% (vs 60%) · 1 short trade.

Equity curve — $10,000 invested

55 trading days
+34%-53%■ strategy■ buy & hold

Recent trades

long & short round-trips
EntryExitSideReturn
2026-07-242026-07-31 (open)SHORT+6.2%
Alt-Data Signal Hub · showing live market data, fetched the moment this page loaded · market & option prices are always live on load · display-only, not advice

All pages

Catalyst EdgeCongressNewsEarningsSEC FilingsHedge FundsLockupsPositioningMarket cycleBacktestOptionsSourcesGlossaryAbout & API