Strategy backtester

Test any of 20 strategies on any ticker — long, short, or both — against free historical prices, and compare to buy & hold. Set trading cost and a stop-loss for a realistic run. Historical simulation only (dividends not modeled); past performance is not indicative of future results, and this is analysis, not advice.

TickerStrategyRangeFast MASlow MAFastSlowSignalRSI lenBuy<Sell>PeriodStd×Lookbackno parametersMorning momentum: breakout → pullback holds → confirmation. Fixed rules, no parameters; real 0DTE option prices. Ignores the cost/stop/range fields below. Best on SPY/QQQ/IWM.

DirectionCapital ($)Trading cost (bps)Stop-loss (%)Out-of-sample (%)Direction lets you trade short too. Cost = bps per trade; stop-loss exits after that % adverse move (0 = off). "Compare all" runs every strategy.

-47.6%

Total Return

$5,244

Ending Value

-80.7%

CAGR

-55.7%

Max Drawdown

-2.14

Sharpe

Win Rate

Trades

51%

Time in Market

XE · SMA Crossover Long & Short turned $10,000 into $5,244 (-47.6%) vs buy & hold $5,091 (-49.1%) over 2026-04-24→2026-09-15 — it beat buy & hold by 1.5%, worst drawdown 56% (vs 62%) · 1 short trade.

Equity curve — $10,000 invested

99 trading days

Recent trades

long & short round-trips

Entry	Exit	Side	Return
••••••••••	•••••••••• ••••••	••••	••••••
••••••••••	••••••••••	•••••	••••••

Alt-Data Signal Hub · showing live market data, fetched the moment this page loaded · market & option prices are always live on load · display-only, not advice

Strategy backtester

Equity curve — $10,000 invested

Recent trades

All pages

Preview mode